Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ernesto Escobedo vs Nick Chappell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Escobedo vs Chappell analysis and find out who is favored!
Ernesto Escobedo vs Nick Chappell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Escobedo 0 - 0 Chappell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Escobedo has won 57.81% of points on his second serve, while Chappell has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Escobedo, in recent form, has won 51.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chappell has won 50.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.3% and 31.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Escobedo has saved 58.89% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chappell has saved 58.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Escobedo has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 30/ 24), with Chappell winning 53.01% (W/L 44/ 39) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Escobedo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 232/ 155), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 38/ 46). Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 217/ 148), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Escobedo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 12/ 14), where as Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.27% of matches (W/L 31/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Escobedo has played against opponents with an average rank of 226.17 while Chappell has played against players with an average rank of 238.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Escobedo has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chappell has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Escobedo has converted 40.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chappell has converted 41.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
418
Rank
67
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
437
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
56% (312-241)
Career Total W/L
53% (303-266)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
44% (12-15)
$909,628
Career Prize Money
$24,525
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ernesto Escobedo | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 44% (12/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (28/25) | 45% (28/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (262/242) | 49% (283/292) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 50% (9/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (5/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 84 | 68 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 31 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:47:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 255.38 | 237.3 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (858/1306) | 62% (1146/1840) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (613/858) | 67% (764/1146) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 58% (259/448) | 49% (341/694) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (51/127) | 40% (79/197) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (509/1346) | 39% (747/1899) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 14% (1/6) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 85% (11/2) | 53% (10/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 44% (12/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 14% (14/2) |
Ernesto Escobedo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Osgar O'Hoisin
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Lorenzo Esquici
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Santiago Padilla Cote
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
15 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 0-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Miguel Angel Alonso
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
3 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Jody Maginley
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
2
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
90%
(
19 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
12%
(
7 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Nick Chappell
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Kousuke Ogura
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Andres Delgadillo
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nick Chappell
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Elijah Strode
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
2
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
10
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
24 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
30 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(17) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
15
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Escobedo Vs Chappell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
